data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3aa5/a3aa5ff1853dd8692cb01ccc69a6adb3a4c351c5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b288/9b288a46a272e7c4e674acb76b7fc872254dd9ca" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f8f4/6f8f4125688c1ce8c0244ceb8843d1a739fcdb56" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edbce/edbce8c13ef5591e518d4b232894c62fa6ff3c10" alt=""
As you know, That's Not My Age is a champion of fashion for the over-forties - I can happily look at older models with wrinkles, grey hair and bunions, all day long. Except when it comes to the All Ages fashion line-up in The Guardian weekend magazine. I know I've said this before but I think it's worth repeating: the styling on the older models is just plain lazy - in fact, I doubt the stylist has even taken the age-factor into consideration. The grown-up ladies are dressed in the same way as the younger girls, often the clothes don't fit properly - take a look at the black puffa jacket/trousers above - the older models aren't properly groomed and the overall impression is one of tokenism. These images are same-y and uninspiring - and nobody wants to look like they've just escaped from a care home. So, please can someone tell Alan Rusbridger to stop peddling this patronising rubbish.
As Jim Royal would say, all ages, my arse!